Archive | NEWS

Healthier men want more sex for more years

Posted on 09 March 2010 by admin

Healthier men want more sex for more years

t1larg.feet.gi Healthier men want more sex for more years

By Ashley Fantz, CNN

(CNN) — Healthier men, no matter their age, are going to have better sex more frequently and desire it more often than healthier women.

And a healthier sex life could mean a longer life.

That’s according to a paper written by University of Chicago researchers that was published Tuesday in the British Medical Journal. While the supposition that men think about sex more than women isn’t new, the paper’s findings have wider implication for attitudes toward public health and how patients respond to doctors’ advice, said Dr. Stacy Tessler Lindau, an associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology and geriatric medicine who spearheaded the research.

“If you are a man diagnosed with diabetes or high blood pressure and I tell you that you need to lose weight and take medication, and I can say the benefit is five extra years of sex life, you might be more inclined to do what I tell you,” she explained.

Lindau said that women generally reported wanting less sex or receiving it less often for three reasons: Women outlive men by an average of five to six years and without a partner, women are less likely to engage in sex. Secondly, there’s a Western cultural acceptance — and removal of stigma — of men who have erectile dysfunction and have turned to relatively recently marketed drugs such as Viagra; women don’t have that.

“Also, there’s a difference in how we treat women for other diseases that affect their sexual desire,” Lindau said. “If a woman is diagnosed with breast cancer and she has, for example, her breasts removed, and we never counsel her about her sexual function, we start to realize how many years of life she’s losing. Not doing those things could mean 10 years of lost sexual activity.”

There are no FDA approved treatments for female sexual dysfunction other than estrogen to treat pain with intercourse, she said.

Lindau’s paper was sponsored by the nonprofit Institute of Medicine.

The paper considers data from two previously published studies that included more than 6,000 men and women, split into two co-ed groups: The first was age 25 to 74. The second group was age 57 to 85. Ninety-eight percent of participants reported having sexual partners only of the opposite sex, she said. Roughly 80 percent of men and 65 percent of women in the study were married or living with a partner.

None of the study’s participants was in a nursing home.

Questions were presented that asked them to give their relationship status and rate their health and the quality of their sex life from poor to excellent.

Excellent was defined not by the number of times someone had sex but the emotional and physical satisfaction of the experience. But, the survey described having sex “regularly” as two to three times a month, said Lindau.

Sex was defined to the 57- to 85-year-old group as “any mutually voluntary activity with another person that involves sexual contact, whether or not intercourse or orgasm occurs” in the past year. For the same time frame, those in the 25-74 age group were asked if they had “had sex with anyone.”

Participants had the option of assigning a number rating to their sex life, including “0″ for “the worst possible situation.” That phrase was up to them to interpret, said Lindau.

The physician concluded that men are more likely to be sexually active, have what they believe is better sex and are consistently more interested in sex than women. This drive for sex among men and the feeling that the sex they get is high quality doesn’t diminish with age. Lindau said it was difficult to ascertain exactly how many of these participants might have taken erectile dysfunction drugs.

If men stay in good shape, they can enjoy more years of good sex, the study says. At age 55, men in very good or excellent health on average gained five to seven years of sexually active life compared with their peers in poorer health. Women in very good shape gained 3 to 6 more years of a quality sex life than women who are less healthy.

For women 60 years and older, sex dropped off significantly overall and was even lower among those without partners. For men in that age range, having a partner didn’t matter — they still wanted sex consistently, the study found.

Among 75- to 85-year-old men, four out of 10 were still having sex, compared with two out of 10 women that age. Women whose partners were still alive, however, were having just as much sex as men, said Lindau.

“I don’t want to perpetuate the notion that older women don’t desire sex,” she said. “There’s a glass half full here. There’s a big hunk of older women still having sex. Women who initiate relationships later in life — they describe passionate love and sex like the way younger people do.”

Lindau said she was frustrated that her sampling was limited to heterosexuals, a typical quandary many experience when testing this topic, she said. She hopes to conduct another study focusing on aging homosexuals, bisexuals or people whose biological sex cannot be classified as either male or female.

Comments (0)

سال 2012 چه بر سر زمین خواهد آمد؟

Posted on 09 March 2010 by admin

سال 2012 چه بر سر زمین خواهد آمد؟ از پیشگویی منجمان “مایا” تا پیش بینی دانشمندان “ناسا

2012 سال 2012 چه بر سر زمین خواهد آمد؟

می گویند سال 2012 ، آبستن یک اتفاق خارق العاده در کره زمین است ؛ البته هنوز هیچ کس از ماهیت واقعی آن خبری ندارد اما هر چه هست ، خبرهای موجود درباره این سال ، اصلا خوشایند نیست. این را ، هم پیشگویان و منجمان قوم مایا می گویند و هم دانشمندان ناسا.

در هشدار ناسا و آکادمی ملی علوم آمده است که میلیونها نفر در سال 2012 بدون برق و در نتیجه بدون غذا و دارو خواهند ماند و تمام یخچالها، تلفنهای همراه و ماهواره ها خاموش می شوند.

ناسا در هشداری اعلام کرد که یک توفان خورشیدی که در سال 2012 به زمین می رسد موجب خواهد شد که برق تمام دنیا خاموش شود.

به گزارش مهر، در هشدار ناسا و آکادمی ملی علوم آمده است که میلیونها نفر در سال 2012 بدون برق و در نتیجه بدون غذا و دارو خواهند ماند و تمام یخچالها، تلفنهای همراه و ماهواره ها خاموش می شوند.

از ماه دسامبر فعالیت خورشید به آهستگی روبه افزایش می رود. نیروی مغناطیسی این ستاره هر 11 سال یکبار به نقطه ای می رسد که در آن پیک پدیده های فورانهای خورشیدی و پرتاب تاجهای خورشیدی بزرگ مشاهده می شود. این پدیده ها منجر به آزاد شدن میزان زیادی انرژی و تشعشعات می شود. این فورانها می تواند به زمین نیز برسد و منجر به ایجاد توفانهای ژئومغناطیسی زمین شود.
ستاره شناسان این پدیده ها را از سال 1859 رصد کرده اند. در آن زمان یک توفان ژئومغناطیسی ویژه در خطوط تلگراف اروپا و آمریکا اختلال ایجاد کرد. در ماه می 1921 توفان دیگری بسیاری از خطوط برق و تلفن را در دو سر اقیانوس اطلس خارج از استفاده کرد.

در گزارش 132 صفحه ای ناسا و آکادمی ملی علوم آمده است: “انرژی برق کلید فناوری جامعه مدرن امروزی است و تمام زیرساختها و سرویسها به آن وابسته هستند. اگر توفان سال 1859 امروز اتفاق بیفتد به طور حتم خسارتهای اجتماعی و اقتصادی وسیعی برجای خواهد گذاشت.”

به گفته دانشمندان ناسا، پیک بعدی این توفانهای خورشیدی بین سالهای 2012 و 2013 خواهد بود که جامعه علمی هنوز بر سر شدت فعالیت خورشید در این دوره جدید به توافق نرسیده اند.

در 2012 چه بر سر ما خواهد آمد؟

ظاهراً، در 21 دسامبر سال 2012 تحل عظیمی در جهان رخ خواهد داد به طوری که بخش بزرگی از نوع بشری نابود خواهند شد.
بله، درست متوجه شدید! دیگر برای شغل آینده ی خود برنامه ریزی نکنید! بدنبال خرید خانه نباشید، و در عوض، چند سال آخر زندگی تان را هرآنطور که می خواهید بگذرانید.

اکنون شما 2 سال فرصت دارید که از زندگی لذت ببرید…!!

مایاها قومی بودند که چند هزار سال پیش تو مناطق آمریکای مرکزی زندگی می کردند، البته الان هم از قوم اونها بازماندگانی وجود دارن. حتما معبد زیر رو که متعلق به مایا هست رو دیدید.

قبل از اینکه وارد مقوله پیش گویی اصلی مایا بشم باید توضیحاتی راجع به قدرت و تمدن این قوم براتون بنویسم.

مایا! قومی که هزاران سال پیش معبد و هرمی که در پايين مشاهده می کنید رو با 365 پله ساخته! به تعداد روزهای سال

Maia سال 2012 چه بر سر زمین خواهد آمد؟

مایا تمامی خسوف ها و کسوف ها را دقیقا تا سال 2012 ثبت کرده و همشون طبق برنامه دارن اتفاق می افتن، مایا چندین هزار سال پیش عدد یک میلیون رو کشف کرده بود، مایا هزاران سال پش تو معابدش تصاویری از سفینه ها و فضانوردان رو روی سنگ ثبت کردن! (این رو خودم به چشم دیدم!).
مایا آن زمان حتی تعداد روزهای هر سال کره ماه رو که گمونم 279 روز هست محاسبه کرده بود. مایا ها از اورانوس و نپتون اطلاع داشتند، تقویم مایا برای 400 میلیون سال استخراج شده است، سال خورشید و زهره را تا چهار رقم اعشار محاسبه کرده اند.

همه اینها رو به دو دلیل اشاره کردم یکیش اینکه بگم مایا چقدر قدرت محاسباتی و علمی داشته و دوم رو هم تو پی نوشت ها خواهید خوند. حالا بریم سر اصل مطلب، پیشگویی!

پیشگویی می گه: تو 21 دسامبر سال 2012 زندگی روی کره زمین وارد یک دوره جدید می شه. تو چند تا سایت خوندم که این دوره جدید پر از صلح و عشق و آرامش و پیشرفت هست. (مصداق حرف یکی از سیاستمداران آمریکایی که پایان بحران مالی آمریکا رو صلح و آرامش تو دنیا می دونست).
حالا چند تا نظریه دیگه هم هستند که به تفضیل روشون بحث می کنم. یکی از استادان دانشگاه هم اطلاعاتی در این مورد داشت، جالبه که گفت ما به ناسا یه ایمیل فرستادیم و پرسیدیم که آیا سال 2012 اتفاقی تو کهکشان خواهد افتاد؟ ناسا پاسخ داده بود که نارسایی هایی مشاهده می شن ولی نمی تونیم تائید کنیم که این اختلالات آسیبی به زمین می رسونن یا نه!

مایاها معتقد بودند که زمین از 5 دوره تشکیل شده، پایان هر دوره یه اتفاق خیلی بد می افته و دوره جدید شروع می شه. جالب اینجاست که 2012 پایان دوره پنجم هست! و ما وارد دوره ششم خواهیم شد، گفته می شه تمدن حاضر از بین خواهد رفت تا دوره ششم شروع بشه

این کدها درخود قسمتها وقسمتهای زیادی را در مورد یک اتفاق هراسناک خورشیدی درسال2012بیان میکند دانشمندان متفق النظر هستند که هر100 سال یا بیشتر شعله های خورشیدزبانه می کشند و منظومه شمسی را تحت تاثیر خود قرار میدهند.

تئوری میگوید که درسال 2012 یک شهاب سنگ باعث انفجار خورشیدی میشود که باعث سوزاندن کره ی زمین میشود.

دو مطلب جالب: یکی اینکه مایا حتی زمان سقوط قوم خودشون رو پیشبینی کرده بودند و عجیب تر از همه: جنگهای جهانی رو هم پیش بینی کرده بودند!

البته دقت کنید که اتمام دنیا به این معنی نیست که همه چیز از بین می ره، حتما شروعی خواهد بود، برای دوره ششم و هنوز مطمئن نیستیم که این دوره چه چیزی را به ارمغان خواهد آورد.

همین حس کنجکاوی خیلی از مردم و دانشمندان را برانگیخته است که چرا تقویم مایان ها در روز ذکر شده تمام می شود.
آیا روز 21 دسامبر سال 2012 روزی است که جهان به پایان می رسد یا اینکه آغاز دوره ای جدید است؟ آیا به پایان رسیدن تقویم مایان ها را می توان نشانه ای دانست بر وقوع یک اتفاق خاص در جهان؟شاید هم …… به هر حال باید صبر کرد.

فیلم 2012

2012 movie سال 2012 چه بر سر زمین خواهد آمد؟

حالا در این باره ، رولان امریچ فیلمی ساخته است که بی گمان باید آن را در زمره شاهکارهای تاریخ سینما نامید.

نام این فیلم 2012 است و علاوه بر جذابیت داستانی ،که روایتگر تلاش آخرین انسان ها برای نجات از دوره پنجم زمین و ورود به دوره ششم حیات است ، از بهترین جلوه های ویژه که تا کنون نظیر آن وجود نداشته ، استفاده شده است به گونه ای که تماشاگر ، مجذوب تصاویری مانند ویران شدن یکجای شهرها ، زیر آب رفتن کوه ها و … می شود و گذر 158 دقیقه این فیلم را متوجه نمی شود.

Comments (0)

پیام هیلاری رادهام کلینتون، وزیر امور خارجه ایالات متحده به مناسبت روز بین المللی زنان

Posted on 08 March 2010 by admin

America.gov

Clinton2 پیام هیلاری رادهام کلینتون، وزیر امور خارجه ایالات متحده به مناسبت روز بین المللی زنان

پیام هیلاری رادهام کلینتون، وزیر امور خارجه ایالات متحده به مناسبت روز بین المللی زنان


هیلاری رادهام کلینتون، وزیر امور خارجه: هشتم مارس روز بین المللی زنان است- روزی که پیشرفت جهان را در زمینۀ ارتقاء حقوق زنان و بازشناختن بقیۀ کارهایی که در این زمینه باید انجام گیرد، بازتاب می دهد.

امسال یاد آورسالگردی است که برای من بسیار گرامی است.  پانزده سال پیش من به اتفاق زنان و مردانی از سراسر گیتی در چهارمین کنفرانس جهانی زنان در پکن شرکت جستم. پیام برخاسته از کنفرانس طنینی بلند و روشن داشت و هنوز هم در امتداد فرهنگها و قاره ها طنین انداز است: حقوق بشر همان حقوق زنان و حقوق زنان همان حقوق بشر است.

نمایندگان صد و هشتاد و نه کشور در پکن یک بیانیۀ اصولی را به تصویب رساندند که افزایش دسترسی زنان را به آموزش، مراقبت بهداشتی و اعتبارمالی، و نیز پاسداری از حقوق آنها را برای این که رها از خشونت زندگی کنند، وعده می داد.

ما به پیشرفتهای بزرگی دست یافته ایم ولی هنوز راه درازی در پیش است. زنان هنوز اکثریت فقیران، ناتندرستان و گرسنگان جهان را تشکیل می دهند. آنها به ندرت عامل جنگ و ستیزهای خشونت بار بوده اند ولی غالبا پی آمدهای جنگ و ستیز ها را تحمل کرده اند. زنان در گفتگوهای مربوط به صلح و امنیت برای پایان دادن به این جنگ و ستیز ها حضور ندارند. به طور ساده، صدای آنها شنیده نمی شود.

امروز ایالات متحده زنان را به تکیه گاه اصلی سیاست خارجی خود تبدیل کرده است، زیرا ما بر این باوریم که این کار درستی است، ولی ما همچنین معتقدیم که کار هوشمندانه ای نیز هست.

سرمایه گذاری در توان بالقوۀ زنان و دختران یکی از مطمئن ترین راه ها برای دستیابی به پیشرفت اقتصادی، ثبات سیاسی و تأمین رفاه بیشتری برای زنان- و نیز مردان- در سرتاسر جهان است.

بنابر این، در این روز بین المللی زنان، بگذارید باردیگر خود را به پیشرفت زنان و دختران و حمایت از آنان وقف کنیم و برای تضمین این که هیچ زنی در قرن بیست و یکم پشت سر گذاشته نمی شود، به یکدیگر بپیوندیم.

Comments (0)

The 82nd Academy Awards: Who Will Win, Who Should Win, and Why

Posted on 06 March 2010 by admin

The 82nd Academy Awards: Who Will Win, Who Should Win, and Why

sandybullock pd The 82nd Academy Awards: Who Will Win, Who Should Win, and Why

Yep, it’s that time of year again: time to see who’ll top the worst-dressed list, who’ll deliver the sappiest acceptance speech, and just how many trophies The Hurt Locker will take home. But, there’s a big difference between who’ll win and who should.

Here are my best bets for the top 10 categories. Check ‘em out and let me know your thoughts, but don’t blame me if you don’t sweep the office pool. And don’t forget to tune in to the 82nd Annual Academy Awards, airing on Sunday on ABC.

Best Picture

Nominees: Avatar, The Blind Side, District 9, An Education, The Hurt Locker, Inglourious Basterds, Precious, A Serious Man, Up, Up in the Air

Who Will Win:
The Hurt Locker

Who Should Win: Inglourious Basterds

Why:
Only three films have a legitimate chance of winning Best Picture: Avatar, The Hurt Locker, and Inglourious Basterds. But because Avatar’s mastermind, James Cameron, and Inglourious Basterds’ writer/director, Quentin Tarantino, and distributor Harvey Weinstein are all hated by hordes of Academy voters, the Kathryn Bigelow-directed war drama will take home the evening’s top prize.

Best Director

Nominees:
James Cameron (Avatar), Kathryn Bigelow (The Hurt Locker), Quentin Tarantino (Inglourious Basterds), Lee Daniels (Precious), Jason Reitman (Up in the Air)

Who Will Win: Kathryn Bigelow

Who Should Win: Kathryn Bigelow

Why: Bigelow’s meticulous and mesmerizing work, accompanied by her Directors Guild victory, will result in history being made as the Academy finally honors its first-ever female Best Director winner.

Best Actress

Nominees:
Sandra Bullock (The Blind Side), Helen Mirren (The Last Station), Carey Mulligan (An Education), Gabourey Sidibe (Precious), Meryl Streep (Julie & Julia)

Who Will Win: Sandra Bullock

Who Should Win: Carey Mulligan

Why: Newbies Carey Mulligan and Gabourey Sidibe would both have had a great shot at taking home gold had they been nominated in different years; but they weren’t, and as a result, they’ll cancel each other out. Helen Mirren, on the other hand, never had a shot. She got her trophy a few years ago for her role in The Queen. Oh, and nobody saw The Last Station. So, we’re down to first-time nominee Sandra Bullock and sixteen-time nominee and two-time winner Meryl Streep. In the closest race of the evening, Sandra will edge out Meryl for two reasons: she’ll probably never receive another nom, and Meryl will be back in the mix again next year.

Best Actor

Nominees: Jeff Bridges (Crazy Heart), George Clooney (Up in the Air), Colin Firth (A Single Man), Morgan Freeman (Invictus), Jeremy Renner (The Hurt Locker)

Who Will Win:
Jeff Bridges

Who Should Win:
Colin Firth

Why: Despite Firth’s heartbreaking performance and Clooney’s award-worthy work, Bridges will have to make room on his crowded mantle for his very first Oscar. Voters love him; he’s won every major award leading up to Sunday; and with four previous noms, everyone feels that it’s simply his turn to take home the trophy.

Best Supporting Actress

Nominees: Penelope Cruz (Nine), Vera Farmiga (Up in the Air), Maggie Gyllenhaal (Crazy Heart), Anna Kendrick (Up in the Air), Mo’Nique (Precious)

Who Will Win: Mo’Nique

Who Should Win: Mo’Nique

Why:
With Vera Farmiga and Anna Kendrick splitting the vote and Penelope Cruz out of contention, it comes down to first-time nominee Maggie Gyllenhaal and fellow newcomer Mo’Nique. While a few critics think Mo’Nique’s polarizing personality could hurt her chances coming down the home stretch, there’s really no doubt in my mind that she’ll emerge victorious and deliver a mag’nifique acceptance speech come Sunday.

Best Supporting Actor


Nominees:
Matt Damon (Invictus), Woody Harrelson (The Messenger), Christopher Plummer (The Last Station), Stanley Tucci (The Lovely Bones), Christoph Waltz (Inglourious Basterds)

Who Will Win:
Christoph Waltz

Who Should Win:
Christoph Waltz

Why: Let’s be honest: Christoph Waltz gave one of the best supporting performances in recent memory. And with minimal competition from his fellow nominees, the 53-year-old Austrian actor will easily waltz away with his first, much-deserved Oscar.

Best Original Screenplay

Nominess: The Hurt Locker (Mark Boal), Inglourious Basterds (Quentin Tarantino), The Messenger (Alessandro Camon and Oren Moverman), A Serious Man (Joel Coen and Ethan Coen), Up (Bob Peterson and Pete Docter)

Who Will Win:
The Hurt Locker

Who Should Win: Inglourious Basterds

Why: Basterds could give Locker a run for its money, but Mark Boal will triumph over Quentin Tarantino and the equally deserving Coen brothers. Best Pic nominee Up doesn’t have a shot; and The Messenger’s nomination was a victory in and of itself.

Best Adapted Screenplay


Nominess:
District 9 (Neill Blomkamp and Terri Tatchell), An Education (Nick Hornby), In the Loop (Jesse Armstrong, Simon Blackwell, Armando Iannucci, Tony Roche), Precious (Geoffrey Fletcher), Up in the Air (Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner)

Who Will Win:
Up in the Air

Who Should Win:
An Education

Why: In an effort to prevent Up in the Air from being shut out on Oscar night (which could very well happen), Academy voters will likely award Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner for their timely script … unless they hand they statue to Nick Hornby, prohibiting An Education from also going home empty-handed.

Best Animated Feature

Nominess: Coraline, Fantastic Mr. Fox, The Princess and the Frog, The Secret of Kells, Up

Who Will Win:
Up

Who Should Win: Fantastic Mr. Fox

Why: Not only is Up a fan favorite, a critical darling, and a box-office behemoth, it’s also only the second animated film in history to be up for Best Picture. As a result, it’s guaranteed to topple the four other films, giving Pixar its third consecutive win in the category, following in the footsteps of WALL-E and Ratatouille.

Best Documentary Feature

Nominess: Burma VJ; The Cove; Food, Inc.; The Most Dangerous Man in America; Which Way Home

Who Will Win:
The Cove

Who Should Win: Food, Inc.

Why: Despite the fact that Food, Inc. was the most fascinating film of 2009, bet on The Cove to bag the Oscar. The tragic dolphin-hunting doc has swept the pre-Oscar soirees, and its producers have been campaigning harder than just about everyone in Hollywood, except for Harvey Weinstein and that guy who tried to trash Avatar’s Best Pic chances.

Comments (0)

Iran’s Ahmadinejad: Sept. 11 attacks a ‘big lie’

Posted on 06 March 2010 by admin

Iran’s Ahmadinejad: Sept. 11 attacks a ‘big lie’

AP

By ALI AKBAR DAREINI, Associated Press Writer

TEHRAN, Iran – Iran’s hard-line President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Saturday called the official version of the Sept. 11 attacks a “big lie” used by the U.S. as an excuse for the war on terror, state media reported.

Ahmadinejad’s comments, made during an address to Intelligence Ministry staff, come amid escalating tensions between the West and Tehran over its disputed nuclear program. They show that Iran has no intention of toning itself down even with tighter sanctions looming because of its refusal to halt uranium enrichment.

September 11 was a big lie and a pretext for the war on terror and a prelude to invading Afghanistan,” Ahmadinejad was quoted as saying by state TV. He called the attacks a “complicated intelligence scenario and act.”

The Iranian president has questioned the official U.S. version of the Sept. 11 attacks before, but this is the first time he ventured to label it a “big lie.”

In 2007, New York officials rejected Ahmadinejad’s request to visit theWorld Trade Center site while he was in the city for a U.N. meeting. The president also sparked an uproar when he said during a lecture inNew York that the causes and conditions that led to the attacks, as well as who orchestrated them, still need to be examined.

At the time, he also told Iranian state TV the attacks were “a result of mismanaging and inhumane managing of the world by the U.S,” and that Washington was using Sept. 11 as an excuse to attack others.

He has also questioned the Sept. 11 death toll of around 3,000, claiming the Americans never published the victims’ names.

On the 2007 anniversary of the attacks, the names of 2,750 victims killed in New York were read aloud at a memorial ceremony.

Comments (0)

Brr! Sexy snow woman gets a frosty reception

Posted on 04 March 2010 by admin

Brr! Sexy snow woman gets a frosty reception
tdy klg snowvenus 100304.300w Brr! Sexy snow woman gets a frosty reception

Despite winter’s chill, ‘Venus’ has neighbors boiling mad over frozen female

Is a naked snow woman too hot for the public?

In the eyes of some Rahway, New Jersey neighbors, the nude snow sculpture of Venus de Milo that one family built in their yard was just plain offensive.

Eliza Gonzalez sculpted the snow lady with her daughter, Maria Conneran, 21, and son Jack Shearing, 12, after last week’s snowstorm.

“She was curvaceous, bodacious and bootylicious,” Gonzalez told the UK Daily Mail. “She had a six-pack!”

But after receiving an anonymous complaint, a Rahway police officer was sent to the home, and reluctantly asked the family to cover up the buff (albeit headless and limbless) bod.

They complied, dressing her in a greenbikinitop2 bing Brr! Sexy snow woman gets a frosty receptionand blue sarong.

“I thought she looked more objectified and sexualized after [we] put thebikini2 bing Brr! Sexy snow woman gets a frosty receptionon,” Gonzalez added.

Not all neighbors gave the snow Venus an icy reception.

“I definitely believe people are way too uptight,” said Frank Mazzuca of Woodbridge, N.J., who took his own photos while driving by one day. “If that’s the case, then don’t take your kids to a museum,” he told WNBC-TV.

Conneran agreed.

“Our snow lady looked like marble. It looked like a statue,” she told the Daily Mail. “Are you going to go to the Met and cover up all the statues?”




Comments (0)

Coast Guard crew survives Utah crash

Posted on 04 March 2010 by admin

Coast Guard crew survives Utah crash

Helicopter flying from Vancouver Olympics to N.C. goes down in mountains

APTRANS Coast Guard crew survives Utah crash

SALT LAKE CITY – Three people were badly hurt when a Coast Guard helicopter crashed in remote Utah mountains amid blizzard-like conditions, but all five on board survived.

Authorities say snow and wind had affected visibility during the flight Wednesday, but they still don’t know if that’s what caused the crash.

The helicopter was one of two returning home from the Vancouver Olympics at the time.

Two people were in critical condition and one was in serious condition, according to hospital officials. All three had to be airlifted from the remote crash site.

Another two with minor injuries were brought out on snowmobiles.

The MH-60T Jayhawk helicopter was one of two traveling through the area en route to home base in Elizabeth City, N.C., after performing security duty at the Vancouver Games, said Dan Dewell, a spokesman for the Coast Guard’s 11th District in Alameda, Calif.

The helicopters made a refueling stop in Salt Lake City — one of several required for the long trip — and were headed to Leadville, Colo., before spending the night in Kansas City.

The helicopter went down in a wooded area about 50 miles east of Salt Lake City.

Bad weather
Coast Guard officials didn’t immediately know why the helicopter went down. Blizzard-like conditions were reported at the time of the crash, said Chief Mike Hvozda, a spokesman for the Coast Guard’s 5th district, which includes Air Station Elizabeth City.

“I’m not sure if that’s what they ran into or not but that’s what was reported to us,” Hvozda said.

The Coast Guard is sending a team to Utah to investigate.

Wasatch County Sheriff Todd Bonner told KSL-TV that visibility was “very minimal” because of snow and wind at the time of the crash.

“They (were) flying a low height, and they just kind of banked in the wrong area — didn’t really see what was there apparently — and into the pine trees,” Bonner said.

Phone call after crash
After the crash, the co-pilot used a cell phone to call the Coast Guard colleagues, Dewell said. Detective Ron Bridge of the Summit County sheriff’s department also said at least one crew member from the downed helicopter communicated via text message, but communications were difficult because of the terrain.

The helicopter ended up on its side in a heavily wooded area accessible only by snowmobile, said Sgt. Jeremy Hales of the Wasatch County sheriff’s office.

The second helicopter spotted the wreckage but had to refuel before it returned to pick up two of the injured, according to Lt. Col. Susan Romano, of the Air Force Rescue Coordination Center in Panama City, Fla. A third crew member was flown out by helicopter.

All were taken to University Hospital at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City.

The Coast Guard said Cdr. Patrick Shaw, 37, Juneau, Alaska, suffered internal injuries; Lt. Cmdr. Steven Cerveny, 40, Lincoln, Neb., had a broken leg; and Petty Officer 2nd Class Gina Panuzzi, 31, Lacey Thurston, Wash., also had internal injuries.

Panuzzi underwent surgery and remained in critical condition, along with Shaw, according to Ryann Rasmussen, a hospital spokeswoman. Cerveny was listed in serious condition.

The two others aboard the helicopter were Petty Officer 3rd Class Darren Hicks, 22, Oroville, Wash.; and Petty Officer 3rd Class Edward Sychra, 26, Blanchard, Ind., according to the Coast Guard.

The crash hits hard with the close-knit Coast Guard community, Hvozda said.

“Whenever we hear something like this, you heart immediately goes out to the folks involved and their families,” he said.

Comments (0)

After fleeing Haiti, family is hit by Chile quake

Posted on 04 March 2010 by admin

Fleeing Haiti, family gets hit by Chile quake

‘My God, I left my country and I didn’t die, but I’m going to die here!’

APTRANS After fleeing Haiti, family is hit by Chile quake

SAN BERNARDO, Chile – The Desarmes family left their native Haiti two weeks after the devastating Jan. 12 earthquake, joining the eldest son in Chile for what seemed a refuge from the fear and chaos of Port-au-Prince2 bing After fleeing Haiti, family is hit by Chile quake.

Their sense of security lasted barely a month. It was shattered at 3:43 a.m. Saturday when one of the most powerful quakes on record shook a swath of Chile.

All the Desarmes’ immediate family survived both quakes. But twice cursed, the family now sleeps in the garden of a home that the eldest son, Pierre Desarmes, found for them just south of the Chilean capital of Santiago. They fear yet another temblor will strike.

“I left my country and came here because of an earthquake2 bing After fleeing Haiti, family is hit by Chile quake,” Seraphin Philomene, a 21-year-old student and cousin of Desarmes, said Wednesday. “And here, the same thing!”

“My God, I left my country and I didn’t die, but I’m going to die here!”

Pierre Desarmes, 34, managed to get his family out of Haiti thanks to personal contacts at the Chilean Embassy in Port-au-Prince and the Chilean armed forces. Nine members of his family — his parents, two brothers and their families, and three cousins — arrived in Santiago on a Chilean air force2 bing After fleeing Haiti, family is hit by Chile quake plane Jan. 23.

Desarmes, the lead singer of a popular Haitian reggaeton band in Chile, still gets choked up when he recalls seeing his family for the first time stepping off the plane.

“I saw them but I didn’t believe it. I said, ‘My God, they’re here.’ It was a very difficult moment,” he said, speaking in French in the garden of the house the family now calls home.

“Each time I think about it, I get sad, because I realize I was able to do this because I was here. But there are so many people who are there and I don’t know what’s going to happen to them.”

Deeply unsettled
His relatives had to leave Haiti with only hours’ notice, receiving instructions on where to go via cell phone text messages from a relative in the United States who was in contact with Desarmes in Santiago. Philomene didn’t even have time to pack, dashing to the Chilean Embassy when she received word the family had been cleared to fly out.

Saturday’s earthquake has made a difficult transition even more traumatic.

“When the aftershocks come, they refuse to stay in the house,” Desarmes said, sipping a Coke at a table in the garden, his relatives sitting nearby.

“I have to talk to them all day long telling them: ‘There are no problems, it’s a country that’s prepared for earthquakes, it’ll pass, it’s not so bad.’ But they don’t hear me. Psychologically for them, they’re still really affected by it.”

Desarmes’ brother, Stanley Desarmes, 32, is deeply unsettled. The father of a 2-year-old girl, Nelia, who plays in the yard, he worries for his family’s safety and is thinking about uprooting them again to move somewhere with less danger of earthquakes.

“I don’t know what I can do, but staying isn’t possible,” he said. “I could die and I could lose my family. I have to leave. I don’t know where, I don’t know how. But I don’t want to die with my family here.”

Philomene, his cousin, plans to stay, hoping to bring the rest of her family to Chile. She was the only member of her immediate family to get out because she was living with the Desarmes in the Haitian capital to finish her studies. Her mother, father, two sisters and a brother are still in Cap-Haitien, a town in northern Haiti about 90 miles from the capital.

“I’ve had no news from them,” she said, choking up.

‘God is looking out for us’
Reached late Wednesday by The Associated Press in Cap-Haitien, Philomene’s father, Luigene Philomene, was elated at the news that his daughter was safe. He said he hadn’t heard from her since before Chile’s earthquake and had been trying to reach relatives in Port-au-Prince for an update.

The elder Philomene said when he heard that his daughter had been in the Chile earthquake he thought of a Haitian saying that loosely translates as “we saved her from the river and she ended up in the sea.” Now he feels she has divine protection and the 43-year-old said he would eagerly join his daughter in South America if he could.

“God is looking for out for us,” he said. “Our family didn’t die in Haiti so they aren’t going to die in Chile either.”

Francius Pierre, a cousin of Seraphin’s in Port-au-Prince, had already learned from a brother that his relatives in Chile survived. Pierre, a university student who injured his knee in the Haitian quake, said Seraphin and his other relatives moved from Haiti for safety.

“If they knew something like this could happen again they never would have gone,” he said.

Comments (0)

Obama’s new health care reform plan to include GOP ideas

Posted on 03 March 2010 by admin

Obama’s new health care reform plan to include GOP ideas

By Dan Lothian and Ed Henry, CNN White House Correspondents

Washington (CNN) — In a last-ditch attempt to craft a bipartisan health care reform bill, President Obama will release a new proposal Wednesday that will include Republican ideas on tort reform and health savings accounts, according to Democratic officials familiar with the plans.

But top Republicans, including House Minority Whip Eric Cantor, R-Virginia, immediately said the new proposal is not good enough and reiterated calls for the president to scrap the plan and start over.

The situation is setting up a likely showdown that top Democrats say will end up with the president trying to pass the health legislation with only Democratic votes through the legislative shortcut of reconciliation.

In fact, senior congressional Democrats have privately expressed frustration that the president is spending time at this late date reaching out to Republicans, when it has become increasingly clear the two parties can not settle their differences on this contentious issue.

The senior Democrats said they think the White House should be devoting time trying to win over Democrats, because it’s still not clear they can secure a simply majority in the House and Senate for the president’s plan.

“Why even bother with the olive branches?” asked one senior congressional Democratic aide. “It’s very clear Republicans are not going to provide any votes.”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Tuesday wouldn’t say whether she has the votes to pass a bill, saying Democrats still need to fill in the details of legislation and get a final price tag on it. But the speaker remained positive about the bill’s prospects in the House.

“Our members want quality affordable health care for all Americans, and I feel very confident that we will accomplish that,” Pelosi said.

The No. 2 House Democrat told reporters he thinks some of the Democrats who opposed the House bill last fall could support the new plan the president is pushing.

“Do I think there’s a possibility of some people changing? Yes, I do,” said House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer. “I think that’s because it will be a different bill than either the House and Senate. It will hopefully take the strengths of both and I think if that happens, as is normally the case, when bills change, members look at it somewhat differently.”

Getting more House Democrats to vote yes is crucial, because the House voted narrowly to pass its version last fall. Two Democrats who voted for that bill have since left Congress — Rep. Neil Abercrombie, D-Hawaii, and Rep. Robert Wexler, D-Florida. Another Democratic supporter, Rep. John Murtha, D-Pennsylvania, died in February.

The one House Republican who voted for the bill, Rep. Joseph Cao of Louisiana, has since said publicly he is unlikely to support the revised Democratic bill.

Hoyer acknowledged it could be an uphill climb for House Democratic leaders to get the votes. That’s because the parliamentary procedure of reconciliation could require that the House first pass the original Senate version, a version many House Democrats oppose, before the Senate would vote on the president’s proposed changes.

Many House Democrats are wary about going first and have a deep distrust of their Senate counterparts after seeing the Senate fail to take up several bills approved by the House.

“I think members want some assurances that those items that they have problems with are, in fact, modified before they vote for the Senate bill. I don’t know that it’s impossible, but it’s difficult,” Hoyer said.

He strongly rejected, as Obama and other Democratic leaders have, Republican demands that Democrats scrap their health care proposals and start over. “Starting over is a euphemism for not doing, frankly,” he said.

Two Democratic officials, a White House official and a senior Democratic congressional aide, said the president is not expected to use the word “reconciliation” during his remarks on Wednesday, instead just calling for an up-or-down vote on the legislation, which is essentially code for the legislative shortcut.

The White House official said the president will “urge Congress to move swiftly toward votes on this legislation.”

The official described the remarks as “moving forward into the final stage of the health insurance reform debate,” so the president will again focus on what he thinks is at stake for American families and businesses, and on how “they’ll have more control over their own health care, they’ll see lower costs, and they’ll see an end to insurance company abuses.”

In highlighting what the White House thinks has been an honest effort to get bipartisan support, the official said Obama will point out that his proposal incorporates the “best ideas from both parties.”

And in contrast to calls for a “baby steps” approach, the president will “restate his preference for a comprehensive bill that will reduce premiums and end discrimination against people with pre-existing conditions,” the official said.

The president will make his remarks at 1:45 p.m. ET in the East Room, and will be joined by health care professionals from across the country and Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.

Comments (0)

آیا پختن غذا باعث تکامل انسان شد؟

Posted on 03 March 2010 by admin

BBC PERSIAN

کلر کینگستون

برنامه هورایزن بی بی سی


پختن غذا چیزی است که همه ما بدیهی فرض می کنیم اما یک نظریه تازه حاکیست که اگر پختن را نیاموخته بودیم، نه تنها هنوز شبیه به شامپانزه بودیم، بلکه مثل آنها باید بخش اعظم روزمان را صرف جویدن می کردیم.

اگر به خاطر غذای پخته نبود، یک فرد معمولی باید روزانه حدود پنج کیلوگرم مواد خام مصرف می کرد تا کالری لازم برای بقا را جذب کند.

این یعنی که شش ساعت از روز را صرف جویدن کنیم.

این یک نظر پذیرفته شده است که با ورود گوشت قرمز به رژیم غذایی اجداد ما، مغز آنها رشد کرد و هوششان افزایش یافت.

گوشت قرمز نه تنها باعث بزرگ شدن مغز اجدادمان شد، بلکه همچنین به نیاز آنها در صرف کردن همه وقتشان برای جستجوی غذا برای حفظ انرژی پایان داد.

در نتیجه فرصتی برای ایجاد ساختارهای اجتماعی پدید آمد.

‘تصادف’

پروفسور ریچارد رنگام از دانشگاه هاروارد معتقد است که مساله فقط به روی آوردن به گوشت قرمز به عنوان یک ماده غذایی مربوط نمی شود.

به نظر او آنچه باعث ایجاد یک تحول عمیق در تکامل انسان شده بیشتر شیوه آماده کردن غذا بوده است تا تغییر عناصر رژیم غذایی.

آسترالوپیتکوس

آسترالوپیتکوس شبیه به میمون بود اما مثل انسان روی دو پا راه می رفت

او می گوید: “فکر می کنم به جرات می توان گفت که پختن بالاترین نقش را در افزایش کیفیت غذا در کل تاریخ حیات ایفا کرده است.”

“اجداد ما به احتمال زیاد غذا را به اشتباه داخل آتش انداختند. بعد متوجه شدند که خوشمزه شده است و این مسیر کاملا تازه ای را رقم زد.”

“برای درک اینکه بدن ما چطور و چه زمانی تغییر کرد، باید با بررسی فسیل ها نگاه دقیقتری به آنچه اجداد ما می خوردند بیاندازیم.”

قدیمی ترین جد ما آسترالوپیتکوس بود که به میمون شباهت داشت.

این موجود دارای شکمی بزرگ حاوی یک روده خیلی بزرگ بود که برای هضم مواد سفت گیاهی ضرورت داشت و دندان های بزرگ و پختی داشت که برای آسیا کردن و خرد کردن گیاهان سفت به کار می رفت.

با این حال این آسترالوپیتکوس بود که زندگی درختی را ترک کرد و وارد ساوانای آفریقا شد و شروع به خوردن حیواناتی که آنجا می چریدند کرد.

و همین تغییر محل سکونت، سبک زندگی و رژیم غذایی بود که باعث تغییرات عمده در آناتومی انسان شد.

مغز بزرگ تر

خوردن گوشت ارتباط نزدیکی به تحولی تکاملی در حدود 2 میلیون و 300 هزار سال قبل دارد که به پیدایش هومو هابیلیس با دندان های تیزتر و مغزی 30 درصد بزرگتر منجر شد.

با این حال مهمترین تحول یک میلیون و 800 هزار سال قبل زمانی که هومو ارکتوس – اولین جد “واقعا انسان” ما – پا به عرصه گذاشت روی داد.

هومو ارکتوس دارای مغزی حتی بزرگتر و آرواره ها و دندان های کوچکتر بود.

بدن ارکتوس نیز چیزی شبیه به ما بود. بازوهای کوتاهتر و پاهای بلندتر ظاهر شد و شکمی که مخصوص هضم گیاهان بود از میان رفت، یعنی ارکتوس نه تنها می توانست سرپا بایستد بلکه می توانست روی دو پا بدود.

مغز

مغز 20 درصد انرژی را درحالت نشسته مصرف می کند

او باهوشتر و سریعتر بود و به گفته پروفسور رنگام پختن غذا را آموخته بود.

او می گوید: “پختن شکم ما را کوچکتر کرد. وقتی غذایمان را پختیم، نیازی به شکم بزرگ نداشتیم.”

“شکم از نظر انرژی پرهزینه است. افرادی که با شکم کوچک دنیا می آمدند می توانستند انرژی شان را ذخیره کنند، بچه های بیشتری داشته باشند و بهتر بقا یابند.”

پروفسور پیتر ویلر از دانشگاه جان مورس لیورپول و همکارش، لسلی ایلو، فکر می کنند همین تغییر در سیستم گوارشی ما بود که امکان بزرگتر شدن مغزمان را فراهم کرد.

انتقال انرژی

پختن، سلول های غذا را می شکند به طوری که برای آزاد شدن مغذی های مورد نیاز بدن، معده باید کار کمتری انجام دهد.

به گفته پروفسور ویلر این تحول “باعث آزاد شدن انرژی ای شد که سوخت مورد نیاز مغزی بزرگتر را فراهم کرد. افزایش اندازه مغز، با کوچک شدن شکم رابطه دارد.”

جالب اینکه ویلر و ایلو دریافتند که کاهش اندازه دستگاه گوارشی دقیقا به اندازه افزایش سایز مغز یعنی 20 درصد بود.

پروفسور استفان سیکور در دانشگاه آلاباما دریافت که غذای پخته نه تنها انرژی بیشتری در بدن آزاد می کند، بلکه بدن هم انرژی کمتری صرف هضم کردن آن می کند.

بنابراین انسان بودن ممکن است بر محور انرژی بگردد.

پختن غذا اصولا یک نوع هضم پیشاپیش است، که مصرف انرژی را از شکم به مغز منتقل کرده است.

به گفته پروفسور ویلر و رنگام و همکارانشان، این تصادفی نیست که انسان ها – باهوشترین موجودات زمین – تنها گونه ای هستند که پخت و پز می کنند.


Comments (0)

Advertise Here
Advertise Here
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement