Archive | July, 2011

‘Friends’ Cast Had 85 Sexual Partners Over 10-Season Run

Posted on 29 July 2011 by admin

%Javedan Tv %Persian American online TV

www.foxnews.com

Turns out that the “Friends” had lots of special friends.

After surveying all 236 episodes of the NBC sitcom, humor Web site splitsider.com has found that the six characters had a total of 85 sexual partners — counting only those that appeared on-screen — throughout the series’ 10-season run.

The most promiscuous one was Joey Tribbiani (Matt LeBlanc), who racked up 17 partners, 23.5 percent of whom accounted for relatively long lasting relationships.

Tied for second place in the sleeping-around category were Phoebe Buffay (Lisa Kudrow) and Ross Gellar (David Schwimmer), who each had 16 partners, although 37.5 percent of Phoebe’s relationships were serious, while half of Ross’ relationships wound up being long-term.

HOT SHOTS: Jennifer Aniston

Rachel Green (Jennifer Aniston) had 14 partners — including baby daddy Ross — with 71.4 percent being serious relationships. BFF Monica Gellar (Courteney Cox) had 13 partners, two famously played by Tom Selleck and Jon Favreau, and went steady with 38.5 percent of them.

The prude of the bunch was, unsurprisingly, Chandler Bing (Matthew Perry). He had a paltry nine partners, 33.3 percent of whom were serious relationships, before he married Monica.

Comments (0)

Ex-Louisiana Gov. Edwin Edwards Marries Prison Pen Pal Less Than Half His Age

Posted on 29 July 2011 by admin

%Javedan Tv %Persian American online TV

www.foxnews.com

NEW ORLEANS — Colorful former Gov. Edwin Edwards, who turns 84 next month, on Friday married a 32-year-old woman who befriended him during his federal prison sentence for bribery and extortion.

Edwards, a Democrat who served four terms as governor in the 1970s, `80s and `90s, did most of the talking after he and bride Trina Grimes Scott emerged from an elevator at the Monteleone Hotel in the French Quarter.

“People who don’t know me don’t know what a wonderful, pleasant, modest fellow I am,” Edwards said when asked how a man his age managed to land a much-younger wife.

He also told reporters how Grimes, who started writing him letters while he was in prison, visited him there regularly on weekends and holidays in recent years.

“The prison was in love with her — they used to watch her walk across the parking lot,” Edwards said, laughing. “They made me the camp hero.”

The two have not talked about what prompted her to choose him as a pen pal.

Edwards spent eight years in federal prison for his role in a bribery and extortion scheme to rig riverboat casino licenses during his fourth term in the early 1990s. In July, he completed six months of home detention and regular reporting to a Baton Rouge halfway house.

Grimes became Edwards’ third wife in what the governor said was a small, private ceremony earlier Friday at the hotel, with a few friends and family in attendance.

“It’s great, I’m very happy,” the bride told reporters. She has posted wedding updates on her Facebook page, which does not list an occupation.

Edwards wore a blue suit, while his new wife wore a cream-colored, knee-length, strapless dress.

A reporter asked what the dress was made of and she said she didn’t know. Edwards, born and raised in Louisiana’s Cajun country, quipped: “It’s Italian silk, with a Cajun twist.”

After posing for pictures, the couple walked around the block to Galatoire’s Restaurant on Bourbon Street, to smatterings of applause from tourists and workers in taxi cabs and delivery trucks.

They were followed by a small parade of reporters, photographers, and an entourage that included state Supreme Court Justice Catherine Kimball, who performed the wedding ceremony, and her husband, former state Rep. Clyde Kimball.

Edwards, who also served in Congress, brought charisma and power to state politics that rivaled that of Louisiana’s other favorite populist sons, Huey and Earl Long.

Though frequently criticized in the press for his link to a Korean rice scandal early in his congressional career, his strong hand in deal-making with legislators as governor and his leadership in the push to legalize gambling in the `90s, Edwards built a reputation for being able to broker coalitions of urban and rural constituencies.

He was last elected governor in 1991, when he faced former Ku Klux Klan wizard David Duke, who ran as a Republican. Business leaders feared Duke’s election would be devastating for the state’s convention business because of his extremist views.

Around New Orleans, bumper stickers began popping up on vehicles, stop signs and park benches that forever immortalized Louisiana’s often stormy romance with Edwards. The stickers read, “Vote for the Crook: It’s Important.”

Edwards won in a landslide.

Comments (0)

Default fears worsen as US Senate blocks debt-ceiling bill

Posted on 29 July 2011 by admin

%Javedan Tv %Persian American online TV

www.telegraph.co.uk

The Democrat-controlled US Senate has blocked a Republican debt-ceiling bill, just two hours after it was narrowly passed in the House of Representatives.

Congress was earlier warned that it was “playing with fire” and President Barack Obama appealed for a compromise as the Tuesday deadline for a resolution of the debt crisis talks loomed ever closer.

The Senate is now instead debating a Democrat plan to avoid a US government default, a spectre that has created fears of a fresh world recession. The Treasury department says that the US will default on its financial obligations on Tuesday if agreement is not reached on raising the debt ceiling.

Late on Friday night the Republican-controlled House had passed a bill, which would have lifted the borrowing ceiling only temporarily, by just eight votes. Democrats had opposed it as unacceptable and “extremist” – while conservatives influenced by the Tea party argued that it did not go far enough.

John Boehner, the Republican Speaker of the House, gave an impassioned appeal to his colleagues in the House to approve his plan, slamming his fist on the podium several times.

“I stuck my neck out a mile to get an agreement with the president of the United States,” he said, referring to failed negotiations with Mr Obama earlier this month

Comments (0)

Fearing scary diagnosis, man drops 175 pounds

Posted on 29 July 2011 by admin

Will Nevin, 25, shed 175 pounds during 11 months, willing to do anything, except face his anxiety about visiting the doctor.

cnn.com

(CNN) — Will Nevin had been dreading the doctor for years.

Nevin knew he was obese, maybe even a likely target for diabetes. At 5 feet 10, Nevin estimates he weighed 350 pounds.

“When I was that size, I (thought), what do I need a scale for?” he said.

An Internet search added to the 25-year-old’s suspicions. He had symptoms such as a tingling in his feet, which he thought was probably a symptom of pre-diabetes at the very least. But it was easier to ignore his size than face the possibility of a complicated diagnosis.

For Nevin, the ultimate evidence of his denial came on a road trip from Alabama to California in January 2010 with a few friends. At the wheel, Nevin abruptly began to feel a tightening in his chest, and his heart started racing.

“What is this? Am I having a heart attack?” he thought, assuming the worst.

Now, Nevin believes he was foolish not to stop or alert his friends, but the feeling passed, the trip continued and he remained determined to not have his fears confirmed by a doctor. He hadn’t seen one since April 2006.

View Will Nevin’s iReport

When he returned to school in Alabama, Nevin kept mentally reliving his scare and wallowing in self-pity; shortly after coming back, he had lost his job, which had consumed all his time.

Now, his evenings consisted of eating and watching TV until bed.

After about a month, Nevin realized that something had to change. He’s still not sure where the spark came from, but he headed to his university’s gym.

“I was 24. That was supposed to be the peak of my health, my energy — really everything,” he said. “If I’m not going to be fit, strong and healthy at 24, then when am I going to be?”

300-plus pound student exercised in secret

The idea to go to the gym was strange, but Nevin says he wasn’t scared, because he didn’t know what he was getting into. The intimidating part came when he actually got to the gym — even the layout was unfamiliar, with the exception of the smoothie counter.

Despite his misgivings, he hopped on the treadmill and walked for three miles that night.

Besides committing to the gym every single day, he did his own research and changed his diet to exclude red meat and fried food, but added in fruits and vegetables.

“I will be the first to admit I did not do this ideally,” he said. “If I had to do it over again, I would have seen a doctor and a nutritionist from the start, at the very beginning. But it just happened to work out for me.”

The gym sometimes proved to be a lonely experience as he dragged himself on the treadmill and observed the chiseled and ripped bodies surrounding him, knowing how unlikely it was that he could ever look like that.

“The toughest moments were when you stepped on the scale and you weren’t satisfied for whatever reason,” he said.

With family life as goal, man drops 177 pounds

But eventually, his hard work paid off. People’s comments of, “You look different,” turned into, “I don’t even recognize you anymore.” There were small victories in tightening his belt to the next hole and getting rid of the 4-XL T-shirts.

“(The result) doesn’t happen the first day, but the clothes start to fit a little better, then they start to fit a little worse — when they fall off.”

For Nevin, one of the biggest benefits of exercising and losing weight was being able to walk up the flight of stairs to his law class and reach the top without feeling winded.

“I can run up a flight of stairs now, and it doesn’t bother me,” he said.

About 11 months later, in January 2011, Nevin sprinted across the finish line — he had met his goal of 175 pounds, half his starting weight. He said there was a relief at finally seeing that number he had been imagining on the scale.

“You look in the mirror at yourself sometimes. Who is that staring back at you?” he said. “It’s almost a sort of disconnected feeling. Your mind is picturing one thing, but you look in the mirror and it’s something completely different.”

Foodie struggles every day to keep pounds off

Nevin also finally faced his doctor, confident that he could handle the truth.

“(The anxiety) went away as soon as the blood tests came back — my sugars were fine, my blood pressure was fine,” he said.

Dr. Melina Jampolis, CNNHealth’s Diet and Fitness expert who is a physician nutrition specialist in California, said research shows losing even 5-10% of one’s body weight can lower blood pressure, blood sugar and cholesterol

“I see it regularly, and certainly for that dramatic of a weight loss in somebody so young, I would be surprised if he didn’t normalize,” she said.

Got your own weight loss story to share? Visit iReport

However, Jampolis said that if a person is pre-diabetic, that genetic predisposition never goes away and will likely come back if the person regains weight. This is why it’s crucial for the changes to turn into a lifestyle.

“Type 2 diabetes is clearly associated with being overweight and (is) responsive in most cases to weight loss,” she said. “If you are concerned that you have symptoms of diabetes, you should absolutely see a doctor and not try to self-treat yourself. It worked out for him, but it might not work out for everybody.”

The most difficult part of Nevin’s journey was powering through the mental setbacks and persevering even when the scale wasn’t showing him the results he wanted to see. He had been overweight since kindergarten, always opting for TV and computer games rather than the outdoors and athletics.

“You have to find a reason you want to do this. It can’t be to please other people and it can’t be purely for cosmetic reasons,” he said. “It has to be because you want to make a serious long-lasting change in your life. … You have to find that inner motivation.”

Now that he knows he’s pursuing a healthy lifestyle, his constant nervousness has turned to peace. His calorie-conscious eating hasn’t ruled out fast food, but while a typical order used to include at least three cheeseburgers and a large order of fries, now it’s a low-fat chicken salad. He still uses the treadmill daily, but his speed and resistance levels have increased.

One unconventional reminder of Nevin’s journey is his wedding band, which is too wide for his finger. To keep it from falling off, he wrapped layers of duct tape around the ring in what he describes as an “inelegant solution.”

It’s also what inspired the name of his blog, Duct Tape Wedding Ring, where he writes about his continuing journey.

“It’s about finding the little solutions that work for you,” he said. “(Even though) they might not be what other people would do. … If I can change my entire life in 11 months, what can’t I accomplish?”

Comments (0)

Mammogram technology may be doing more harm than good

Posted on 28 July 2011 by admin

%Javedan Tv %Persian American online TV

CNN.com
By Karen Pallarito, Health.com

Many radiologists rely on specialized computer software to pinpoint suspicious areas in routine mammograms.

But in a large new study, the technology failed to improve breast cancer detection and also increased a woman’s risk of being told she had an abnormal mammogram when she was, in fact, cancer free.

The study analyzed 1.6 million mammograms taken at 90 radiology facilities in seven states between 1998 and 2006. The findings, which appear online in the “Journal of the National Cancer Institute,” extend and confirm the results of a controversial 2007 study from the same research team that cast doubt on the value of the technology, known as computer-aided detection, or CAD.

“Women should probably understand that CAD is probably being used to interpret their mammogram and that it’s probably not helping detect breast cancer earlier,” says Joshua J. Fenton, M.D., the lead author of both studies and an assistant professor of family and community medicine at the University of California at Davis School of Medicine, in Sacramento.

Health.com: Simple things that could cut your breast cancer risk

Routine annual mammograms are widely recommended for women 40 and older. The breast X-rays can detect cancer at an early stage, when it’s most treatable, but they aren’t perfect; they miss up to 20% of breast cancers, according to the National Cancer Institute.

Having two radiologists interpret a mammogram has been shown to improve the detection rate. In recent years, studies have found CAD software — which scans mammogram images and highlights areas that may require a closer look — to be just as effective in detecting cancers as a second pair of eyes.

Vijay M. Rao, M.D., chair of the radiology department at Jefferson Medical College, in Philadelphia, says that in light of the new evidence, radiologists should use more discretion in interpreting CAD results. “Is it a legitimate pair of eyes? Is it really doing the job that the radiologists want it to do?”

Health.com: Celebrities who battled breast cancer

The Food and Drug Administration approved the first CAD software in 1998, after a series of small clinical studies found that CAD could boost breast cancer detection without causing an unacceptable number of false-positives, cases in which doctors mistakenly identify benign abnormalities as cancerous.

CAD is now used in roughly three of every four screening mammograms, according to a 2010 analysis of Medicare data published in the “Journal of the American College of Radiology.”

Medicare pays doctors an additional $12 per mammogram for CAD over and above the reimbursement for the mammogram itself, which ranges from about $80 (for conventional film-screen mammograms) to $130 (for newer digital mammograms).

In the new study, which included more than 680,000 women, the researchers examined film mammograms because too few digital mammograms were conducted during the study period to allow a thorough analysis. (Breast X-rays produced on film must be converted to digital images before they can be analyzed by the computer software.)

The detection rate for noninvasive breast abnormalities improved at radiology facilities that adopted CAD technology, but, crucially, the rate did not improve for invasive breast cancers, the dangerous type that invade healthy tissue in the breast or other parts of the body.

Health.com: Understanding your breast cancer diagnosis

Moreover, in facilities that began using CAD the percentage of women with abnormal mammograms who were accurately diagnosed (a measure known as “positive predictive value”) dropped, from 4.3% to 3.6%.

Rates of false-positives and “recalls” — being called back for further testing — increased slightly after facilities implemented CAD. However, the biopsy rate declined over time regardless of whether CAD was used.

In a similar study published in the “New England Journal of Medicine” in 2007, Fenton and his colleagues reported that CAD reduced the accuracy of mammograms and led to a higher rate of false-positives.

Health.com: How to help a loved one cope with breast cancer

The new investigation shared the same overall design, but the researchers addressed criticisms directed at the earlier study by including a larger number of CAD screens and by excluding mammograms interpreted in the first three months after a facility adopted CAD, when radiologists were becoming accustomed to using the technology.

Despite these improvements, it’s still unclear from the new study whether individual radiologists used CAD correctly, or even whether they used it at all, says Carol H. Lee, M.D., chair of the American College of Radiology’s Breast Imaging Commission, and a New York City-based breast-imaging specialist.

“It makes me think that we as a medical community need to further evaluate the use of CAD,” says Lee, who does not use CAD in her own practice. “But I don’t know that just based on this study that we should abandon this technology.”

Health.com: 25 breast cancer myths

The Medical Imaging & Technology Alliance, an Arlington, Virginia,-based trade association that represents medical imaging developers and manufacturers, said in a prepared statement that other recent studies have demonstrated the benefits of CAD.

Women should have access to the “right scan at the right time,” the association said, whether it’s mammography with CAD or another imaging technique.

In an editorial accompanying Fenton’s study, Donald A. Berry, Ph.D., chair of the department of biostatistics at MD Anderson Cancer Center, in Houston, says economic incentives — including the use of CAD as a defense in malpractice suits — “may stoke its continued proliferation.”

Researchers and device companies should work to make the software better, but in an experimental setting and not while exposing millions of women to a technology that may do more harm than good, Berry writes.

Comments (0)

Debt ceiling Q&A: How did we get here, what happens next?

Posted on 28 July 2011 by admin

%Javedan Tv %Persian American online TV

Washington Bureau Staff

Question: The federal government has run through its ability to borrow money and soon will run out of cash to pay its bills. How did the government get into this problem?

Answer: As recently as the final years of the Clinton administration, the federal government was running a sizable budget surplus, and the national debt was declining relative to the size of the U.S. economy. Then several things happened: Under President George W. Bush, Congress enacted two big tax cuts, in 2001 and 2003, which cut federal revenues. Under Bush, the country also adopted an expensive new prescription drug plan for senior citizens and pursued wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, all of which raised the government’s expenses. The combination led to increasing deficits and, as the government borrowed money to cover those deficits, a rapid increase in the national debt. Then came the recession, which cut tax revenues further and pushed up expenses even more for things like unemployment insurance and President Obama’s economic stimulus plan. Now, the debt has hit the statutory limit of $14.3 trillion.

Q: What happens if the debt limit is not increased?

A: The government won’t have the money to pay all its bills. Tax revenue will continue to flow in but will cover only about 55%-60% of the government’s daily obligations. The possibility of the government not paying its bills — defaulting — could dramatically unsettle financial markets and lead to a rapid increase in interest rates for mortgages, consumer loans and the government, financial experts have warned.

Q: How soon will the government run short?

A: No one knows for sure. Much depends on the pace at which tax revenues come in. The Treasury Department has said Aug. 2 is the last day on which it can be sure of having enough money. The Treasury is scheduled to make $23 billion in Social Security payments on Aug. 3, which could be a major hurdle. Outside budget experts say that if the Treasury gets past that payment, it might be able to scrape by for another week, assuming markets remain calm.

Q: What sort of payments are we talking about?

A: When people think of the federal government, the image in mind tends to be the well-known government departments and agencies — State, Defense, the FBI, EPA and the like. But those agencies make up only a fraction of federal spending. The salaries of every federal government civilian worker — from the president down to the clerk at the Social Security office — totaled together come to only about 5% of federal spending.

For the lion’s share of what the federal government does, think of a huge machine that takes in tax revenue and puts out tens of millions of checks to individuals. These are often called “transfer payments” because they transfer money from one group to another. Some transfer payments go to children and some to working-age adults for things like unemployment. But the bulk go to retirees for Social Security, Medicare, veterans benefits and other programs.

Q: If the government can’t pay all its bills, who would get paid?

A: Officials have not yet said, but the administration is expected to announce its standby plans in the next few days. The top priority is expected to be to pay the interest owed to bondholders — about $29 billion in August — because failure to do that would destroy the nation’s credit rating. After that, the government may simply pay bills in the order in which they are due, to the extent that cash is available.

Q: What about the Social Security Trust Fund? Can’t that be used to pay Social Security benefits?

A: No. The government will continue to collect Social Security taxes, but the taxes flow in across the month, while the checks go out at the beginning of the month. Normally, the Treasury advances money to Social Security at the start of each month to pay that month’s checks, then gets repaid as the tax money comes in. But the Treasury can’t make that advance if it doesn’t have cash. And while the Social Security Trust Fund has more than $2.5 trillion in assets, that money is invested in U.S. government securities. Usually, that’s a good thing because U.S. government securities are considered the world’s safest investment. In this case, it’s a problem because if the government doesn’t have money, it can’t cash in the securities.

Q: Could the president just order bills to be paid even if Congress hasn’t raised the debt ceiling?

A: Various people have floated ideas for how the president could bypass the debt-ceiling law, but White House officials have said none of those proposals pass legal muster.

Q: Congress has been trying for weeks to pass an increase in the debt ceiling. Why wasn’t it this hard in previous years?

A: Actually, it’s often been hard. In the late 1980s Congress had so much trouble passing increases in the debt ceiling that the House adopted a rule allowing the ceiling to be raised without a vote. That rule was in effect for years. During the Reagan administration, Congress also balked. The problem is always harder when government is divided between the two parties. And it’s more politically unpopular when the economy is bad. The effort is particularly hard now because the level of debt has risen so high.

Comments (0)

Despite a pick-up in growth at the end of last year, the economy has taken a hard turn for the worse in the last few months.

Posted on 28 July 2011 by admin

%Javedan Tv %Persian American online TV

cnn.com

NEW YORK (CNNMoney) — Despite a pick-up in growth at the end of last year, the economy has taken a hard turn for the worse in the last few months.

On Friday, the government will report how much the economy expanded in the second quarter — but don’t expect much good news.

A CNNMoney survey of economists forecasts the economy grew only 1.8% in the second quarter, which would be a slight slowdown from the first quarter, when it grew an already lethargic 1.9%.

That sluggishness comes after some encouraging growth of 3.1% in the last quarter of 2010. Things seemed to be moving in the right direction.

But then in 2011, the recovery was hit by a series of events, including a precipitous rise in gas prices, natural disasters that disrupted major world economies and a worsening sovereign debt crisis in Europe. And lawmakers’ bickering about the debt ceiling here at home certainly hasn’t helped either.

All of those factors are rattling consumers, whose spending habits alone account for roughly 70% of the nation’s gross domestic product.

Debt ceiling made easy

Spending takes a hit: Just when spending was finally starting to pick up, consumers pulled back in February, and growth began to slow for the next three months.

Can you blame them? During that time, gas prices rose to a national average of $3.98 a gallon, its highest level since 2008, and hit Americans’ wallets hard.

“Higher gas prices were robbing other areas of spending, and that — first and foremost — shows up in GDP,” said Ellen Zentner, senior U.S. economist for Nomura.

In June, consumer confidence — as measured by the Conference Board — hit its lowest level since November.

Zentner predicts Friday’s report will show consumer spending only picked up 0.6% in the quarter — less than half the 2.2% rate it grew in the first three months of the year.

“That kind of growth represents households that are spending only on necessities,” Zentner said. “We don’t have households reaching for credit. They’re still very much mired in that mind set of paying down debt, rather than taking on debt. And that, on top of a weak labor market, is keeping consumers from spending.”

Where the jobs are

Job market slumps: The year began on strong footing, with job growth picking up and layoffs tapering off.

But then hiring hit a snag in the second quarter, and employers began to tap on the breaks. After adding 497,000 jobs in the first three months of the year, growth started to slow in April. By June, the job market barely showed a pulse.

Meanwhile, at least 400,000 Americans file fresh unemployment claims each week and about 14 million people are currently unemployed.

Housing double dips: Making matters worse for Main Street, home prices plunged to their lowest level since 2002 earlier this year.

While some signs show the housing market has hit bottom, low home prices continue to impact both consumers’ spending patterns, and their ability to relocate for jobs, Zentner said.

Because of this effect, economists predict residential investment — which accounts for about 2% of the country’s GDP — slowed in the second quarter.

What entrepreneurs want from Obama

Manufacturing slows down: After a solid eight months of accelerating, growth in the manufacturing sector started to slow in March, according to the ISM Manufacturing Index.

Recently, several regional reports have also pointed to a manufacturing slowdown and on Wednesday, a government report showed orders for durable goods like aircraft, autos and computers fell in June.

Part of the recent weakness could still be due to the impact of Japan’s earthquake and tsunami on the global supply chain, but economists also say it appears lower demand is also taking its toll.

Fed to the rescue? Not so fast

The few bright spots: Second quarter GDP is basically riding on two key strengths — a ramp up in business investment and stronger exports, said Jim O’Sullivan, chief economist for MF Global.

“Corporate profits are growing even more, and companies have been piling up cash,” he said, pointing to reports that show businesses have recently boosted their spending on items like equipment and software.

While those strong corporate balance sheets have yet to translate into meaningful job growth for average Americans, business spending accounts for about 10% of GDP — so it will help the growth numbers look better.

Meanwhile, rapid growth in emerging markets like China has also helped U.S. exports pick up. Exports grew rapidly in the second quarter, whereas imports barely changed due to fewer shipments from Japan. That effect is expected to add to the GDP figures, even if it is only temporary

Comments (0)

Latex Casey Anthony mask fetches almost $1 million on eBay

Posted on 28 July 2011 by admin

%Javedan Tv %Persian American online TV

cnn.com

A big spender on eBay shelled out almost $1 million to get inside Casey Anthony’s head.

A Los Angeles eBay user called “prophunter” wound up with six rubber renderings of Anthony’s face that had been used in a parody video and put one of them up for auction on eBay. That first mask  garnered a winning bid of $999,900 Wednesday. It beat out 104 other bids that started at $25 on  Monday.

In the description field for the item, the seller billed it as “possibly the most frightening mask on the planet.”

The mask’s expression is, well, expressionless, capturing the image that became a national obsession over the course of Anthony’s almost six-week trial for the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter, Caylee. Anthony was acquitted on July 5, drawing the vocal ire of crowds outside the courthouse, social media users and television personalities nationwide.

On HLN’s Showbiz News Tonight on Wednesday, Popeater.com columnist Rob Shuter pronounced then-active bidding “tasteless, but it is capitalism.”

For comparison’s sake, the most expensive set of Charlton Heston’s stone tablets from “The Ten Commandments” fetched $87,000 at Christie’s in 1995, which would be a little more than $120,000 today.

Comments (0)

Posted on 28 July 2011 by admin

%Javedan Tv %Persian American online TV

cnn.com

(CNN) — Make-up advertisements featuring actor Julia Roberts and supermodel Christy Turlington have been banned in the UK because of their controversial use of ‘airbrushing’.

Britain’s Advertising Standards Agency issued the ban after politician Jo Swinson complained about the two ads, for foundation products made by L’Oreal’s Maybelline and Lancôme brands.

L’Oreal admitted the photographs it used had been digitally manipulated and retouched.

But the cosmetics giant claimed they “accurately illustrated” the effects their make-up — Maybelline‘s The Eraser anti-ageing foundation and Lancôme‘s Teint Miracle –could achieve.

The company described the Roberts image — taken by celebrity photographer Mario Testino — as an “aspirational picture.”

However, the watchdog ruled that the magazine ads were misleading, and exaggerated the ability of the products they were promoting to cover lines, wrinkles and blemishes.

“On the basis of the evidence we had received we could not conclude that the ad image accurately illustrated what effect the product could achieve, and that the image had not been exaggerated by digital post production techniques,” the ASA said.

Swinson, who has waged a long-running campaign against the use of “unrealistic” images in fashion and advertising, said it was “shocking” that the ASA had not been allowed to see the original version of the Roberts photograph.

“It shows just how ridiculous things have become when there is such fear over an un-airbrushed photo that even the advertising regulator isn’t permitted to see it.”

The Scottish MP welcomed the ban, and said it should act as a wake-up call to advertisers, urging them to “get back to reality.”

“Pictures of flawless skin and super-slim bodies are all around, but they don’t reflect reality,” she said. “With one in four people feeling depressed about their body, it’s time to consider how these idealised images are distorting our idea of beauty.

“Excessive airbrushing and digital manipulation techniques have become the norm, but both Christy Turlington and Julia Roberts are naturally beautiful women who don’t need retouching to look great.”

Both Maybelline and Lancôme said they were “disappointed” at the ASA’s ruling, insisting that The Eraser and Teint Miracle were scientifically proven, and pointing to consumer tests which showed users were satisfied with their results.

It is not the first time their parent company L’Oreal has fallen foul of Britain’s advertising authorities. In 2007, a TV advertisement for its Telescopic mascara — featuring actor Penelope Cruz — was criticized for failing to make clear she had been wearing false eyelashes.

Comments (0)

Who owns America? Hint: It’s not China

Posted on 24 July 2011 by admin

%Javedan Tv %Persian American online TV

www.cnn.com

Editor’s Note: The following piece comes from Global Post, which provides excellent coverage of world news - importantmoving and odd.

By Tom Mucha, Global Post

Truth is elusive.  But it’s a good thing we have math.

Our friends at Business Insider know this, and put those two principles to work today in this excellent and highly informative little slideshow, made even more timely by the ongoing talks in Washington, D.C. aimed at staving off a U.S. debt default.

Here’s the big idea:

Many people — politicians and pundits alike — prattle on that China and, to a lesser extent Japan, own most of America’s $14.3 trillion in government debt.

But there’s one little problem with that conventional wisdom: it’s just not true. While the Chinese, Japanese and plenty of other foreigners own substantial amounts, it’s really Americans who hold most of America’s debt.

Here’s a quick and fascinating breakdown by total amount held and percentage of total U.S. debt, according to Business Insider:

  • Hong Kong: $121.9 billion (0.9 percent)
  • Caribbean banking centers: $148.3 (1 percent)
  • Taiwan: $153.4 billion (1.1 percent)
  • Brazil: $211.4 billion (1.5 percent)
  • Oil exporting countries: $229.8 billion (1.6 percent)
  • Mutual funds: $300.5 billion (2 percent)
  • Commercial banks: $301.8 billion (2.1 percent)
  • State, local and federal retirement funds: $320.9 billion (2.2 percent)
  • Money market mutual funds: $337.7 billion (2.4 percent)
  • United Kingdom: $346.5 billion (2.4 percent)
  • Private pension funds: $504.7 billion (3.5 percent)
  • State and local governments: $506.1 billion (3.5 percent)
  • Japan: $912.4 billion (6.4 percent)
  • U.S. households: $959.4 billion (6.6 percent)
  • China: $1.16 trillion (8 percent)
  • The U.S. Treasury: $1.63 trillion (11.3 percent)
  • Social Security trust fund: $2.67 trillion (19 percent)

So America owes foreigners about $4.5 trillion in debt. But America owes America $9.8 trillion.

For a smart take on how President Obama and House Republicans should end gridlock over debt and deficits, see our new GlobalPost series The Negotiator, which features Wharton’s negotiation guru Stuart Diamond.

And to bone up on China’s debt — another potentially big global economic headache — check out this interview with brainy-yet-coherent Northwestern University economist Victor Shih, who spoke with GlobalPost’s David Case.

Comments (0)

Advertise Here
Advertise Here
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement